z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Proxy Warfare's Impact on Sectarianization: The Case of Saudi-Iranian Rivalry
Author(s) -
Pauline Crepy
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
flux
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2562-6094
DOI - 10.26443/firr.v9i1.6
Subject(s) - rivalry , middle east , authoritarianism , proxy (statistics) , political science , political economy , dominance (genetics) , alliance , aggression , development economics , ancient history , criminology , economy , history , law , democracy , sociology , economics , psychology , politics , computer science , social psychology , biochemistry , chemistry , machine learning , gene , macroeconomics
The Saudi Arabian and Iranian rivalry has torn the Middle East apart, aggravating the region’s struggles concerning persistent authoritarianism, militia violence, and sectarian tensions. This paper explores the impact of proxy warfare on sectarianization by studying the case of the Saudi-Iranian rivalry in both Syria and Yemen. It analyses the reasons for using the proxy warfare as a means to further assert rival dominance in the Middle East and examines how the rivals use existing sectarian tensions to further their cause, leading to further division. The paper finds that proxy warfare has fortified the sectarian rift in the Middle East, increasing the risk of confrontational war between Saudi Arabia and Iran and exacerbating already existing religious strains across the region.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here