z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Public management of smart cities: European experience
Author(s) -
Svetlana Zakharova
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
cifrovaâ sociologiâ
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2713-1653
pISSN - 2658-347X
DOI - 10.26425/2658-347x-2022-5-1-36-43
Subject(s) - smart city , technocracy , corporate governance , cloud computing , legitimacy , transparency (behavior) , business , knowledge management , politics , political science , public relations , computer science , computer security , internet of things , finance , law
The article presents a rethinking of the results of research in the eld of smart city management based on publications in Spain and the Netherlands. Three areas of research have been identied. The rst one offers scientic studies of smart city management and recommendations for improving the effectiveness of smart management based on a clear understanding of the degree of legitimacy of decision-making. The author considers these processes in comparison with the Russian scientists approaches, and focuses on the important conclusion of foreign scientists that technology alone will not make the city smarter: the construction of a smart city requires a political understanding of technology, a process approach to management, an emerging smart city, and a focus on both economic benets and other public values. The second group of articles, considered by the author, presents a more comprehensive view of the concepts of smart cities, with smart governance, combining, presumably, innovative structures and new technologies, new communication channels aimed at the constant functioning of the city management system and the environment for cooperation and citizen engagement. The third group of publications deals with critical aspects of the development of smart governance in practice and the resulting consequences, in particular, the reassessment of the ability of the private sector to develop and implement intelligent technologies, the predominance of a technocratic approach to decision-making, the inability to ensure impartiality and objectivity, the lack of the ability to analyse urban data, cloud computing on digital platforms to stimulate production in a collaborative environment. Their conclusion about the need for “smart management” to pay attention to the processes of socio-spatial development is quite correlated with the conclusions of Russian scientists.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here