Open AccessThe Current Dietary Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Food Underestimates the Actual Risk
Author(s) -
Jürg A. Zarn,
H. Geiser
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
chimia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.387
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 2673-2424
pISSN - 0009-4293
DOI - 10.2533/chimia.2019.832
Subject(s) - no observed adverse effect level , risk assessment , toxicology , acceptable daily intake , potency , term (time) , environmental health , environmental science , toxicity , risk analysis (engineering) , medicine , biology , pesticide , ecology , computer science , biochemistry , physics , computer security , quantum mechanics , in vitro
Dietary risk assessments (DRA) help determine safe exposure levels of toxic substances in food. Of these, Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI), derived from No Observed Adverse Effect Levels (NOAEL) of long-term toxicity studies, is compared to exposure estimates using lifetime-averaged food intakes. These estimates ignore intermittent high exposures exceeding the ADI; toxic effects of such exposures are considered irrelevant, on the assumption that toxic potency increases with exposure duration, which would be reflected by decreasing NOAELs. However, our statistical analysis of thousands of animal toxicology studies shows that NOAELs after short- and long-term exposure are similar if study design factors are considered. Thus, the short- and long-term potency effects of chemicals are similar. Hence, a short-term toxic effect is generally ignored in current DRA. It accounts for lifetime-averaged but not intermittent high food intakes and, therefore, must be revised. Additionally, there is no added value of long-term studies for ADI derivation.