
Students’ Achievement Levels, Gender, and Learning Styles on Abstract Algebra: A Profile of Evidence Developing Ability
Author(s) -
Leo Adhar Effendi,
Sindi Amelia
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
mathematics research and education journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2621-3885
pISSN - 2620-4169
DOI - 10.25299/mrej.2020.vol4(1).2776
Subject(s) - learning styles , mathematics education , bachelor , indonesian , test (biology) , psychology , diversity (politics) , qualitative property , computer science , paleontology , linguistics , philosophy , archaeology , sociology , biology , anthropology , history , machine learning
Mathematics education students’ ability on developing evidence needs to be reviewed by lecturers. 50% of the subjects in the mathematics education departement require students' accuracy in analyzing mathematical statements. This is increasingly important because the Indonesian National Qualifications Framework (KKNI) for the Bachelor level requires graduates to become technicians / analysts. The diversity of levels of students’ ability, gender, and learning styles are assumsed to be the discrepancy abilities to develop evidence. This study aims to describe the evidence developing ability based on the levels of achievement, gender, and student learning styles. The subjects of this study were abstact algebra students in the mathematics education department. Type of this research was descriptive qualitative with data collection techniques using test and non-test techniques. Students were given five questions about abstact algebra that demanded the evidence developing ability. The achivement levels and gender were obtained from students’ academic achievement data. The learning styles were attained from questionnaires. The results of the study is higher the students’ academic achievement, better the evidence developing ability on Abstract Algebra. The gender does not affect the evidence developing ability on Abstact Algebra. Students with visual learning styles have the ability to develop evidence better than students with other learning styles.