z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
DETERMINACION COMPARATIVA DE LA PRODUCCION PRIMARIA CON LAS TECNICAS DE 14C Y 02 EN AGUAS SALOBRES CON DIFERENTES GRADOS DE EUTROFICACION
Author(s) -
Klaus Gocke,
Carlos A. Hernández J.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
boletin de investigaciones marinas y costeras/boletín de investigaciones marinas y costeras
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.177
H-Index - 14
eISSN - 2590-4671
pISSN - 0122-9761
DOI - 10.25268/bimc.invemar.1994.23.0.388
Subject(s) - fjord , brackish water , productivity , phytoplankton , oceanography , environmental science , biology , geology , ecology , salinity , nutrient , economics , macroeconomics
The primary productivity of phytoplankton was determined in the mesotrophic Kiel Bight (KB), the eutrophic Kiel Fjord (KF) and the hypertrophic Schlei Fjord using the 14C-technique and the 0 2 -method. Results of these measurements were compared. These brackish areas of the Western-most part of the Baltic Sea differ markedly in primary productivity (PP). If the depth of maximum productivity alone is considered, the PP, on a volumetric basis, of the Schlei was 9 times higher than in the Kiel Fjord and more than 40 times that of the Kiel Bight. On an area basis the differences were much smaller since the compensation depth in the Schlei was found at no more than 0.8 m, whereas in the Kiel Bight it was 5.5 m and 5.2 m in the Kiel Fjord. In agreement with theoretical considerations, the PP determined with the 1*C-technique (1*C-PP) was larger than the net productivity (NP) and smaller than the gross productivity (GP), both determined with the 0 2-method using a photosynthetic quotient of 1.2. On average, in the Kiel Fjord the NP was 9 % smaller and the GP 36 % larger than the 14C-PP. In the Kiel Bight the NP was 40 % smaller and the GP 72 % larger. However, the relation NP<14CPP<GP was found only in the Kiel Bight and - Fjord, whereas in the polyproductive Schlei the 14C-PP was larger than both the NP and GP (32 % larger than the NP and 7 % larger than the GP). This deviation from theoretical values may be due, in part, to a senescent phytoplankton, which may have had a PQ smaller than 1.2.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here