z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Variation of Contrast Values for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography Hybrid Systems with Different Correction Methods
Author(s) -
Hazem M. Tantawy,
Yasser G. Abdelhafez,
Nadia Helal,
Ibrahim E. Saad
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of clinical imaging science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2156-7514
pISSN - 2156-5597
DOI - 10.25259/jcis_123_2020
Subject(s) - nuclear medicine , contrast (vision) , correction for attenuation , medicine , single photon emission computed tomography , attenuation , image quality , emission computed tomography , tomography , gamma camera , perfusion scanning , perfusion , radiology , positron emission tomography , optics , physics , image (mathematics) , artificial intelligence , computer science
Objectives: Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) hybrid systems have the advantage of performing various scans using the same imaging setting. Absorption and scattering of the gamma rays by the patient’s body significantly affect images obtained from scintigraphy, especially in myocardial perfusion imaging. An important parameter for image quality in SPECT is image contrast which is defined as the difference in density between regions of the image corresponding to different levels of radioactive uptake in the patient. The objective of the study was to evaluate the influence of applying different correction methods on image contrast of myocardial SPECT/CT images. Material and Methods: A total of 114 patients, 43 females and 71 males, patient’s raw data were processed and analyzed using attenuation correction (AC), scatter correction (SC), both attenuation and scatter correction together (ACSC), and no correction (NC). The short axis (coronal) slices resulted from the raw data reconstruction were chosen to perform the processing for hot and cold spheres for contrast values measurement. Statistical analysis was made for the measured contrast values for AC, SC, ACSC, and NC to determine the best image contrast. Results: When applying SC alone, it yields better contrast value (0.834), compared to AC (0.677) and ACSC (0.739). Both ACSC and AC had better image contrast compared to NC (0.592). Conclusion: The intercomparison study between the correction conditions indicates that the counts in SPECT/ CT are highly affected by all correction methods. The image contrast has been significantly improved by using SC, AC, and ACSC when compared with the NC image. Furthermore, SC is superior in the image contrast than the other correction conditions in the reconstruction of SPECT/CT MPI.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom