Open AccessOn derivative consequence argument
Author(s) -
D. N. Razeev
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
omskij naučnyj vestnik. seriâ "obŝestvo. istoriâ. sovremennostʹ"
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2541-7983
pISSN - 2542-0488
DOI - 10.25206/2542-0488-2020-5-4-66-68
Subject(s) - vagueness , argument (complex analysis) , physicalism , epistemology , derivative (finance) , term (time) , philosophy , metaphysics , economics , linguistics , physics , biochemistry , chemistry , quantum mechanics , financial economics , fuzzy logic
The article gives critical remarks to the derivative consequence argument proposed by Bogdan Faul. The first critical remark concerns the ontological status of the laws of nature, the second remark deals with the term «physicalism». It is demonstrated that conceptual vagueness of the terms used by B. Faul in his article undermines the validity of the proposed derivative argument