Open AccessVisualization of the Results of the Analysis of Programming Languages for Their Superficial Comparison
Author(s) -
Lidia Vasiljevna Gorodnyaya
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
vestnik novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. seriâ: informacionnye tehnologii/vestnik novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. seriâ: informacionnye tehnologii v obrazovanii
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2410-0420
pISSN - 1818-7900
DOI - 10.25205/1818-7900-2021-19-2-29-52
Subject(s) - computer science , programming language , programming paradigm , inductive programming , fifth generation programming language , decomposition , programming language theory , procedural programming , functional logic programming , comparison of multi paradigm programming languages , fourth generation programming language , novelty , declarative programming , third generation programming language , reactive programming , ecology , philosophy , theology , biology
The article is devoted to the choice of a clear and concise form for presenting the results of analise and comparing programming languages and systems, convenient for assessing the expressive power of languages and the complexity of implementing systems. The formalization is adapted to the paradigm analysis of the definitions of programming languages and the selection of practical criteria for decomposition of programs. The semantic decomposition of the definitions of languages and systems as part of the analysis of programming paradigms was chosen as the main ap-proach. Such a choice makes it possible to single out autonomously developed typical program components that can be adapted to the design of various information systems. Many works on methods for developing software systems depend on the practicality of approaches to decomposition of programs debugged using programming systems. The solution to this problem is useful when studying programming methods, studying the history of programming languages, for comparing programming paradigms, the potential of used circuits and models, assessing the novelty level of created programming languages, and also when choosing criteria for program decomposition. In addition, their existence allows us to form a teaching methodology for developing the components of information systems. Along the way, the distance in conceptual complexity between programming and programming system development is shown.