z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The WAN-IFRA discourse: advice, application, and disqualification of organisational models in media
Author(s) -
Joël Langonné,
Magali Prodhomme
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
brazilian journalism research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.153
H-Index - 2
eISSN - 1981-9854
pISSN - 1808-4079
DOI - 10.25200/bjr.v10n1.2014.624
Subject(s) - ideology , dialectic , materiality (auditing) , corporate governance , political science , convergence (economics) , journalism , sociology , media studies , epistemology , law , aesthetics , management , economics , philosophy , politics , economic growth
Among the multiple exhortations made on the liberating - even saviour-type - role of the digital era over the past ten years in the field of journalism, one constant has remained: criticism of managerial models and dialectic of economic ones in the media which have defined the spheres of action, resulting in these discourses without ever sealing their fate. A fate that for several years now has been marked by a process in which journalists are being cast aside in favour of a managerial standpoint that broadly integrates 'convergence' as a tool of governance. This paper aims to question (as one of many mediations instituting convergence as a structuring model) WAN-IFRA's discursive and ideological materiality. This international organisation of newspapers and news publishers has set its sights on convincing the print media of the necessity to switching to multiformat; to convergence. This work investigates the stability and/or instability of the WAN-IFRA discourse, as well as its ability to absorb other discourses. Lastly, through a cloud of prescriptive discourse it will indicate those discourses enforced by some managers in the media business.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here