
Verantwortung für die Fraglichkeit des Menschen? Zum Status der Philosophischen Anthropologie
Author(s) -
HansPeter Krüger
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
labyrinth
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2410-4817
pISSN - 1561-8927
DOI - 10.25180/lj.v18i1.34
Subject(s) - intuition , epistemology , distancing , sociology , philosophy , covid-19 , medicine , disease , pathology , infectious disease (medical specialty)
Responsibility means not just to give the right response to a question. It should not necessarily succeed to ask and respond about acts, and to submit them to some discursive rules. In fact, responsibility is related to an indefinite questioning: How could some question-answer-rules, which consequences exceed a situation, be adequately applied to this situation? To give an answer to this questionability, it would be necessary to move in a self-relating language as well as in a distancing intuition. Thus, the author argues that it would be irresponsible if the philosophic-anthropological question about the human being could be answered by the application of some discursive rules.