Open AccessSOMEONE ELSE’S SPEECH IN THE INTERROGATION PROTOCOL AS A TYPE OF A SECONDARY TEXT
Author(s) -
K.V. Shulgina,
Kspu named after V.P. Astafiev
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
sibirskij filologičeskij forum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2587-7844
DOI - 10.25146/2587-7844-2020-12-4-60
Subject(s) - interrogation , invective , contempt , protocol (science) , linguistics , utterance , computer science , psychology , social psychology , medicine , law , artificial intelligence , philosophy , alternative medicine , pathology , politics , political science
Statement of the problem. The tasks of modern forensic linguistic expertise include solving the question of whether the text contains a negative evaluation component that characterizes a person. The qualificative, “properly human” [Shmelev, 1981, р. 5] category of assessment, which organizes the process of conflict communication, is manifested in the interrogation protocol at the lexical level within the framework of an invective utterance. For the first time, the article considers secondary invective statements as substantial inclusions in the structure of the interrogation protocol of someone else’s conflict speech. The purpose of creating such speech utterances is assessment which determines the negative attitude of the subject to the object. Secondary invective statements are examined from the point of view of their formal content structure, as well as ways of their representation in the text of the interrogation protocol. The purpose of the article is to study the features of reproduction of someone else’s conflict speech in the interrogation protocol as a secondary speech genre. The material of the study was the interrogation protocols compiled by officials during the preliminary investigation of criminal cases about insulting a representative of the authorities or contempt of court. The research methods used are general scientific research methods (observations, comparisons, descriptions), as well as methods of semantic, functional, component and propositional analysis.