data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c3fd/2c3fd2c05ec175716150fd2054ac6d9c19b5c66f" alt="open-access-img"
En torno al ‘filohelenismo’ de los escolios homéricos
Author(s) -
Jaume Pòrtulas
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
fortvnatae
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2530-8343
pISSN - 1131-6810
DOI - 10.25145/j.fortunat.2020.32.38
Subject(s) - greeks , feeling , philosophy , literature , ethnic group , classics , history , art , law , epistemology , political science
Iliad’s ancient commentators replaced the Homeric dichotomy “Achaeans vs. Trojans” with “Greeks vs. Barbarians”. Modern scholars no longer call the Trojans ‘barbarians’; but they usually oppose Trojans and ‘Greeks’, dispensing with the original denominations of Achaeans, Danaans, etc. This distortion is not innocuous: it assumes without discussion that the Iliad’s ancient audiences experienced a special affinity for one side and identified it with “our side”. It is not impossible that this feeling existed at times; but it is abusive to interpret it in an ethnic, national or ‘patriotic’ sense. However, this is what the Scholia usually do, seriously distorting, in many cases, the original text