z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
En torno al ‘filohelenismo’ de los escolios homéricos
Author(s) -
Jaume Pòrtulas
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
fortvnatae
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2530-8343
pISSN - 1131-6810
DOI - 10.25145/j.fortunat.2020.32.38
Subject(s) - greeks , feeling , philosophy , literature , ethnic group , classics , history , art , law , epistemology , political science
Iliad’s ancient commentators replaced the Homeric dichotomy “Achaeans vs. Trojans” with “Greeks vs. Barbarians”. Modern scholars no longer call the Trojans ‘barbarians’; but they usually oppose Trojans and ‘Greeks’, dispensing with the original denominations of Achaeans, Danaans, etc. This distortion is not innocuous: it assumes without discussion that the Iliad’s ancient audiences experienced a special affinity for one side and identified it with “our side”. It is not impossible that this feeling existed at times; but it is abusive to interpret it in an ethnic, national or ‘patriotic’ sense. However, this is what the Scholia usually do, seriously distorting, in many cases, the original text

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here