z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
INKONSISTENSI PENERAPAN PRINSIP INDEPENDENSI KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DALAM PELAKSANAAN SELEKSI CALON HAKIM
Author(s) -
Ikhsan Azhar
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
veritas et justitia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2460-4488
pISSN - 2460-0555
DOI - 10.25123/vej.3070
Subject(s) - government (linguistics) , independence (probability theory) , constitution , selection (genetic algorithm) , supreme court , virtue , law , order (exchange) , political science , normative , computer science , business , philosophy , mathematics , linguistics , statistics , finance , artificial intelligence
The general public in 2017 hotly debated the implemented selection process of Judges. The focus is on the issue of government involvement in the selection process which potentially jeopardize the judiciary’s independence.  In discussing this particular issue, the author uses a juridical normative or dogmatic approach and other data is collected by the use of library research . In addition, the author also compares the existing policy and rules/regulation concerning judge selection from different government’ era (the Old & New Order). A number of conclusions can be drawn from this comparison, i.e. that during the Old dan New Order Government, the judiciary was never considered independent. The government on a regular basis intervene in the selection process, appointment and placement of judges and have a strong say in their professional carrer path.  In contrast, only after the fall of the New Order Government, did the Judiciary enjoy independence which is guaranteed by virtue of Law 35/1999 and the 1945 Constitution (amended version).  Unfortunately though the Supreme Court decide to bring back in the government in the selection process and in doing that jeopardize the judicary’s independence.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here