English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In Indonesia, the act of corruption is a prevalence. Anti-corruption acts have been waged for years, yet the problem of corruption remains unresolved. The rising awareness on sustainability accounting urges many companies to support anti-corruption acts. Whether or not these companies support is a different issue. Although GRI Standards view anti-corruption acts as an economic aspect, the corruption is an act of defiling the society’s trust and constitutes as a highly sensitive issue in a democratic country such as Indonesia. This study applies sensemaking theory to determine that Indonesia-based companies should have supported the anti-corruption acts and disclose them in their sustainability reports. A thorough content analysis on the sustainability reports of 80 Indonesia-based companies has been conducted with a view to finding disclosures of anti-corruption acts. The result shows that most of these companies do not disclose their anti-corruption acts. In a sensible sense, the commitments to supporting anti-corruption acts by companies result in the disclosure of such anti-corruption acts. The finding evidences how Indonesian company are still lacking in acts against corruption.

Whether or Not Indonesia-Based Companies Consider Anti-Corruption Acts Important as Its Countrymen do