Whether or Not Indonesia-Based Companies Consider Anti-Corruption Acts Important as Its Countrymen do
Author(s) -
Paulina Permatasari,
Felix Wijaya Indra Putra,
Vania Natasha
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
indonesian management and accounting research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2442-9724
pISSN - 1411-8858
DOI - 10.25105/imar.v16i1.7873
Subject(s) - language change , indonesian , sustainability , business , democracy , accounting , political science , law , politics , art , ecology , linguistics , philosophy , literature , biology
In Indonesia, the act of corruption is a prevalence. Anti-corruption acts have been waged for years, yet the problem of corruption remains unresolved. The rising awareness on sustainability accounting urges many companies to support anti-corruption acts. Whether or not these companies support is a different issue. Although GRI Standards view anti-corruption acts as an economic aspect, the corruption is an act of defiling the society’s trust and constitutes as a highly sensitive issue in a democratic country such as Indonesia. This study applies sensemaking theory to determine that Indonesia-based companies should have supported the anti-corruption acts and disclose them in their sustainability reports. A thorough content analysis on the sustainability reports of 80 Indonesia-based companies has been conducted with a view to finding disclosures of anti-corruption acts. The result shows that most of these companies do not disclose their anti-corruption acts. In a sensible sense, the commitments to supporting anti-corruption acts by companies result in the disclosure of such anti-corruption acts. The finding evidences how Indonesian company are still lacking in acts against corruption.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom