Open AccessFaking Is as Faking Does: A Rejoinder to Marcus (2021)
Author(s) -
Robert P. Tett,
Daniel Simonet,
Neil Douglas Christiansen
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
personnel assessment and decisions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2377-8822
DOI - 10.25035/pad.2022.01.005
Subject(s) - presentation (obstetrics) , contrarian , psychology , position (finance) , empiricism , personality , social psychology , epistemology , philosophy , economics , medicine , finance , financial economics , radiology
Applicant faking poses serious threats to achieving personality-based fit, negatively affecting both the worker and the organization. In articulating this “faking-is-bad” (FIB) position, Tett and Simonet (2021) identify Marcus’ (2009) self-presentation theory (SPT) as representative of the contrarian “faking-is-good” camp by its advancement of self-presentation as beneficial in hiring contexts. In this rejoinder, we address 20 of Marcus’ (2021) claims in highlighting his reliance on an outdated empiricist rendering of validity, loosely justified rejection of the negative and moralistic “faking” label, disregard for the many challenges posed by blatant forms of faking, inattention to faking research supporting the FIB position, indefensibly ambiguous constructs, and deep misunderstanding of person–workplace fit based on personality assessment. In demonstrating these and other limitations of Marcus’ critique, we firmly uphold the FIB position and clarify SPT as headed in the wrong direction.