Open AccessA person through the centrist metric of a central worldview: pros and cons
Author(s) -
Naila Akhedovna Sarkarova
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
kant
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2222-243X
DOI - 10.24923/2222-243x.2021-38.33
Subject(s) - anthropocentrism , cons , epistemology , sociology , matrix (chemical analysis) , metric (unit) , strengths and weaknesses , environmental ethics , philosophy , computer science , economics , materials science , composite material , programming language , operations management
The article describes the main centrist matrix of the study of man: cosmocentrism, theocentrism, anthropocentrism, ratiocentrism, sociocentrism. Their strengths and weaknesses, as well as the limits of applicability, are analyzed. Some ways of overcoming centrist thinking, which is an exclusive, divisive strategy in culture and thinking, are explored. The article substantiates the importance of an inclusive, connective strategy in culture and anthropology, which allows us to find new dimensions of human essence.