z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Od-Kantować Rawlsa: ewolucyjne uzasadnienie teorii sprawiedliwości w ujęciu Kena Binmore’a
Author(s) -
Sebastian Szymański
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
argument
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2084-1043
pISSN - 2083-6635
DOI - 10.24917/20841043.9.1.4
Subject(s) - criticism , metaphysics , philosophy , epistemology , economic justice , mathematical economics , positive economics , economics , neoclassical economics , law , political science
De-Kanting Rawls: evolutionary justifcation of the theory of justice by Ken Binmore: The article discusses the criticism of John Rawls’s theory of justice formulated by Ken Binmore. Binmore criticizes Rawls in his work for inadequate justifcation of fairness norms. In his opinion, their proper justifcation requires the rejection of Kant’s “metaphysics” in favor of Hume’s empiricism. To explain how fairness norms actually work, one must frst provide a convincing account of evolutionary processes that could lead to such norms being encoded in our genome. Secondly, it should be explained how this biological mechanism interacts with our cultural heritage and generates a selection of balance points in games that describe our social interactions.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here