Open AccessPotential Legal Conflict For The Implementation Of Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 65 /POJK.04/2020
Author(s) -
Theresia Anita Christiani
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
jurnal magister hukum udayana (udayana master law journal)/jurnal magister hukum udayana
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2502-3101
pISSN - 2302-528X
DOI - 10.24843/jmhu.2021.v10.i01.p02
Subject(s) - legal research , financial services , business , regulatory authority , legal service , economic justice , enforcement , compensation (psychology) , finance , normative , primary authority , capital market , law , accounting , political science , public administration , psychology , psychoanalysis
Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 65 / POJK .04 / 2020 was promulgated to increase effectiveness and justice in law enforcement in the capital market sector. The form of legal protection regulated is the Return of Unauthorized Profits and the Investor Loss Compensation Fund (Disgorgement Fund). The research objective in this paper is to find potential legal conflicts that arise in the implementation of the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 65 / POJK .04 / 2020. The research method, this type of research is normative juridical research, which uses secondary data. The findings obtained are that there are two potential legal conflicts. First, there is a potential conflict between the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 65 / POJK .04 / 2020 and Law Number 37 of 2004. Second, the Potential Conflict between the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 65 / POJK. 04/2020 with Law Number 37 the Year 2004 and Law Number 40 the Year 2007, which will obstruct legal objectives.