Open Access“The starting point”: History of the Theory of International Relations as a New Sub Discipline
Author(s) -
Tatya Alekseeva
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
pravo i upravlenie. xxi vek
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2587-5736
pISSN - 2073-8420
DOI - 10.24833/2073-8420-2018-3-48-69-79
Subject(s) - international relations , international relations theory , epistemology , post realism , multitude , coherence (philosophical gambling strategy) , context (archaeology) , sociology , politics , social science , positive economics , political science , law , history , economics , philosophy , mathematics , statistics , archaeology
. A new sub discipline of the Theory of international relations – The History of the TIR, is already in place in the scientifc community of international studies. One of the most important problems, stated by the scientists, is the heterogeneity, fragmentation and the lack of fnished structure of the Theory of international relations. This article is devoted to only one of the multitude of questions: what date may be regarded as a “starting point”, the beginning of the discipline from which we should analyze the achieved results? Materials and Methods. While preparing this article, the author used the method of the comparative study of the intellectual traditions in the history of the political and legal thought. The Results of the Study. Nowadays the Theory of international relations is still at the stage of formation with its main features as fragmentation and absence of coherence towards the key moments of its development, including the date of its birth. Therefore, the appearance of the new discipline – History of the Theory of international relations – is quite natural as it helps to build necessary “bridges” and to clarify the details of the international studies development. Discussion and Conclusions. Today none of the existing theoretical or epistemological attitudes can be regarded suffciently complete to pretend for a monopoly in the international studies. Moreover, no real intellectual progress allows this or that theoretical worldview to have the absolute priority. In the context of the quite complicated and contradictory issues that exist in real international relations, no simple or unequivocal explanation is possible. Therefore, it is high time to turn away from the endless interdisciplinary debates and start evaluating the real problems, but it would presuppose, according to David A. Lake, the recognition of different judgments and articulation of the lexicon which is able to identify not only what the various research traditions have in common but also what differentiates them.