z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Just “performance nonsense”?: How recipients process news photos of activists’ symbolic actions about climate change politics
Author(s) -
Antal Wozniak
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
nordic journal of media studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2003-184X
DOI - 10.2478/njms-2021-0004
Subject(s) - visual rhetoric , framing (construction) , ambiguity , the symbolic , rhetoric , meaning (existential) , politics , persuasion , citizen journalism , sociology , cognitive psychology , psychology , social psychology , computer science , political science , history , linguistics , law , philosophy , archaeology , psychoanalysis , psychotherapist , programming language
In this article, I investigate how recipients make sense of images that show symbolic actions by environmental activists during two recent United Nations Climate Change Conferences. Environmental advocacy groups are successful in creating visibility for their symbolic actions via news visuals, but little empirical evidence exists about how ordinary media recipients engage with this type of imagery. Can they understand the intended meaning of complex visual rhetoric used by environmental activists? I use think-aloud protocols to uncover the cognitive strategies which are used in processing these stylised visual claims. Results show that news photos rarely manage to communicate the intended meaning of symbolic actions. By systematically analysing various stages of visual frame processing, this study offers insights into specific configurations of the image-viewer relationship that cause high levels of ambiguity and prevent staged visual claims from being understood as intended. Yet I also find empirical evidence for a visual framing approach that works well and describe this recipe for effective communication via symbolic action photography.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here