Open AccessImproved estimation of left ventricular volume from electric field modeling
Author(s) -
Leonie Korn,
Stephan Dahlmanns,
Steffen Leonhardt,
Marian Walter
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of electrical bioimpedance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.292
H-Index - 16
ISSN - 1891-5469
DOI - 10.2478/joeb-2021-0015
Subject(s) - electric field , ventricle , radius , calibration , biomedical engineering , volume (thermodynamics) , conductance , range (aeronautics) , materials science , mechanics , physics , mathematics , cardiology , computer science , medicine , condensed matter physics , composite material , statistics , computer security , quantum mechanics
Volume measurement is beneficial in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy to quantify patient demand. In principle, an LVAD could provide a platform that allows bioimpedance measurements inside the ventricle without requiring additional implants. Conductance measured by the LVAD can then be used to estimate the ventricular radius, which can be applied to calculate ventricular volume. However, established methods that estimate radius from conductance require elaborate individual calibration or show low accuracy. This study presents two analytical calculation methods to estimate left ventricular radius from conductance using electric field theory. These methods build on the established method of Wei, now considering the dielectric properties of muscle and background tissue, the refraction of the electric field at the blood-muscle boundary, and the changes of the electric field caused by the measurements. The methods are validated in five glass containers of different radius. Additional bioimpedance measurements are performed in in-vitro models that replicate the left ventricle’s shape and conductive properties. The proposed analytical calculation methods estimate the radii of the containers and the in-vitro models with higher accuracy and precision than Wei’s method. The lead method performs excellently in glass cylinders over a wide range of radii (bias: 1.66%–2.48%, limits of agreement < 16.33%) without calibration to specific geometries.