z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Making Modern Knowledge of Traditional Carpentry in China and Japan: Myth, Reality and Transmission
Author(s) -
Chao Ren
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
host
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1646-7752
DOI - 10.2478/host-2021-0012
Subject(s) - carpentry , china , craft , modernization theory , architecture , period (music) , cultural heritage , narrative , sociology , engineering , visual arts , political science , civil engineering , aesthetics , law , art , literature
Carpentry skills were among the most important elements of building practice in premodern China and Japan, and traditional carpentry skills continue in use in both countries to the present day. Although their importance has been greatly marginalised in building practice, in both countries some master carpenters have gained public recognition. This paper compares the modernisation of traditional building knowledge in China and Japan, and the fate of carpentry knowledge as the building industry and the formal discipline of architecture evolved. It distinguishes three phases in this historical trajectory: the period during the introduction of Western architecture as a discipline, when traditional knowledge was rejected or used selectively in the construction of national histories of building; the period when modern technology took over the main building industry and traditional craftsmen had to confront the realities of new technologies of production; and the period, still unfolding today, where heritage movements are promoting the recuperation and development of traditional craft knowledge. For each country, the paper traces how the nation’s history of building was selectively fashioned into an orthodox narrative; explores the content of key early technical works (for China, the official handbook Yingzao fashi [Building standards] and the craftsman’s manual Lu Ban jing [Carpenters’ Canon], and for Japan kikujutsu [literally, “compass and ruler techniques”] books); and shows how a talented master carpenter succeeded in creating a niche for himself within the contemporary heritage culture. It concludes that differences in the cultural respect accorded to carpentry knowledge in the two countries are rooted in the contrasting status of craftsmen in the premodern era.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here