Open Access基于遗传单系与鉴别特征的系统发生种的划分及其对哺乳动物分类学的意义
Author(s) -
Eliécer E. Gutiérrez,
Eliécer E. Gutiérrez,
Guilherme Siniciato Terra Garbino,
Guilherme Siniciato Terra Garbino
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
zoological research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.933
H-Index - 19
ISSN - 2095-8137
DOI - 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2018.037
Subject(s) - extant taxon , criticism , monophyly , biological classification , spurious relationship , biology , taxonomic rank , phylogenetic tree , epistemology , ecology , clade , evolutionary biology , computer science , philosophy , political science , machine learning , taxon , law , biochemistry , gene
A recently proposed taxonomic classification of extant ungulates sparked a series of publications that criticize the Phylogenetic Species Concept (PSC) claiming it to be a particularly poor species concept. These opinions reiteratively stated that (1) the two fundamental elements of the "PSC", i.e., monophyly and diagnosability, do not offer objective criteria as to where the line between species should be drawn; and (2) that extirpation of populations can lead to artificial diagnosability and spurious recognitions of species. This sudden eruption of criticism against the PSC is misleading. Problems attributed to the PSC are common to most approaches and concepts that modern systematists employ to establish species boundaries. The controversial taxonomic propositions that sparked criticism against the PSC are indeed highly problematic, not because of the species concept upon which they are based, but because no evidence (whatsoever) has become public to support a substantial portion of the proposed classification. We herein discuss these topics using examples from mammals. Numerous areas of biological research rest upon taxonomic accuracy (including conservation biology and biomedical research); hence, it is necessary to clarify what are (and what are not) the real sources of taxonomic inaccuracy.