z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
KOMPARASI MASLAHAT PERSPEKTIF AL-TUFI DAN AL-SYATIBI
Author(s) -
Mayyadah Mayyadah
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
bilancia jurnal studi ilmu syariah dan hukum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2579-9762
pISSN - 1978-5747
DOI - 10.24239/blc.v12i2.370
Subject(s) - set (abstract data type) , limit (mathematics) , epistemology , computer science , sociology , philosophy , mathematics , programming language , mathematical analysis
In comparing the masculine concepts of these two figures, the researcher concluded that the concept of maslahat al-Tufi and al- Syatibi only had differences at the epistemological level. If al-Tufi positions maslahat as a supremacy of the law which is higher than the nas, while al-Syatibi is more careful by trying to combine the text massively and not justifying the reason beyond the limit set. In this concept of maslahah, al-Syatibi excels in elaborating his theory in more detail as the goal of the Shari'ah so that it develops into a whole theory sid, while al-Tufi does not formulate maslahat theory in one form of writing as in al-Syatibi with the book al-Muwafaqat essay.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom