
Between Existentialism and Anti-Existentialism
Author(s) -
Oleh Bondar
Publication year - 2022
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2738-2753
DOI - 10.24234/wisdom.v21i1.605
Subject(s) - existentialism , pollock , argumentative , argument (complex analysis) , socrates , philosophy , epistemology , confusion , art , psychoanalysis , art history , psychology , medicine
The article is an evaluation of Pollock’s anti-existentialist argument and its place in the contemporary debates about Existentialism. We demonstrate that the main contemporary objections to Pollock’s Anti-Existentialism can be grouped into two argumentative directions: (1) Pollock’s supposed confusion of inner and outer truth (Fine, Speaks); (2) Pollock’s assumption that there is such state of affairs as Socrates’s not existing (Kroon). We also introduce an argument against Pollock`s crucial argumentative step against existentialism.