Arguments of Cause-And-Effect Relationships in Person’s Expectations With Divergent Thought

The goal of the research is to reveal the semantic divisions of cause-and-effect, receiving arguments, processing and presenting information through person’s implicit judgments. The methodological apparatus of the research has been chosen in the result of the combination of danger, emotion, provability connected with the subjective arguments of cause-and-effect relations. Through Ch. Osgood’s method of semantic differential, the Ishikawa diagram analytical tool and PARLA (Problem-Action-Result-Learned-Applied) method the effects of word, consequently, the action grade, force-activity factors were revealed. The results of the research: Through the theoretical-experimental study of cause-and-effect relationships dependent, independent variables are proved with the polar qualities internalized by the person: “Danger”-"Security", "Emotional stability -Emotional instability", "Proof-Denial’’. From the viewpoint of Ch. Osgood's semantic differential the importance of word force, activity and evaluation is proved through syllabic formulas (“All A-s are B” or "are not B", "If A, then B"). The analyzes of “cause-and-effect-cause”, in the framework of PARLA method, aimed at the application of one's actions, enable the transformation of  person's cognitive activity into a reflexive ability with the consciousness of the effect emphasized by divergent thinking, personal expectation of post-work consciousness, and K. Ishikawa’s diagram, carried out with five phases, makes the multidimensional thinking more controlled