z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A test of construct validity of the work meaning inventory
Author(s) -
Jinkook Tak,
HyungJoon Seo,
Yongjae Woo,
HyeonJoo Sim
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
han'gug simlihag hoeji. san'eob mich jo'jig/korean journal of industrial and organizational psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2671-4345
pISSN - 1229-0696
DOI - 10.24230/kjiop.v30i3.357-372
Subject(s) - construct validity , psychology , meaning (existential) , construct (python library) , exploratory factor analysis , test (biology) , sample (material) , social psychology , test validity , work (physics) , applied psychology , psychometrics , developmental psychology , computer science , engineering , mechanical engineering , paleontology , chemistry , chromatography , psychotherapist , biology , programming language
The purpose of this study was to test the eight factors model and a high order factor structure of the Work Meaning Inventory(WMI) developed by Tak et al.(2015) and with a sample of employees. Data were obtained from 1,000 employees using online survey. Results of exploratory factor analyses confirmed the original 8 factors of the WMI, confirming the construct validity of the WMI. Also results of high-order factor analyses showed that the three higher order factors(make a living, growth opportunity, self-actualization) were obtained. Finally, the implications, limitations, and future studies are discussed.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here