Open AccessOwnership Structured Firms in Malaysia: Audit Committee Characteristics and Audit Fees
Author(s) -
Norziaton Ismail Khan,
Susela Devi,
Wai Meng Chan
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
social and management research journal/social and management research journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 0128-1089
pISSN - 1675-7017
DOI - 10.24191/smrj.v16i2.7065
Subject(s) - accounting , business , audit , corporate governance , listing (finance) , audit committee , government (linguistics) , economic interventionism , joint audit , chief audit executive , finance , politics , internal audit , linguistics , philosophy , political science , law
The political economy shaped the ownership structure of corporations in Malaysia. The rapid growth of the economy has not diluted the concentrated ownership structure in the Malaysian firms. Malaysia has its own unique feature of ownership structured firms which can be divided into politically connected (PCON) firms, institutional ownership and managerial ownership (INST&MGRL) firms, and family ownership (FAMILY) firms. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether PCON, INST&MGR and FAMILY firms are associated with higher audit fees. This study also examines the association between audit committee characteristics IND, DIL and EXP and audit fees based on the revamped Bursa Listing Requirements in 2008, which focus on audit committee characteristics. Using data from 567 firm-year observations from years 2008 to 2010, we find that PCON firms pay higher audit fees than INST&MGRL and FAMILY firms. Further, the association between audit committee IND, DIL and EXP audit fees is positive and significant for PCON firms. Suggesting that the government intervention is expected to produce better governance and improve the firm’s business performance. This is because the government has given much attention and initiatives to ensure that these firms perform in an effective way and assist the government to improve the economic growth.