Open AccessVoluntary and compulsory integrated reporting: Evidence on reporting quality
Author(s) -
Mira Susanti Amirrudin,
Mohd Noor Abdullah,
Zakiah Saleh
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
journal of emerging economies and islamic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2289-2559
DOI - 10.24191/jeeir.v9i3.14996
Subject(s) - integrated reporting , voluntary disclosure , quality (philosophy) , business , accounting , turnover , index (typography) , sample (material) , actuarial science , economics , management , computer science , ecology , philosophy , chemistry , epistemology , chromatography , world wide web , sustainability , biology
This study investigates the quality of Integrated Report (IR) in the voluntary and compulsory setting. This study's first objective is to measure IR disclosure quality and assess whether companies comply with the 2013 IR framework. The second objective is to examine whether there is any difference in reporting quality between the IR's compulsory regime and voluntary regime. A sample of 120 international companies listed on the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) websites throughout three years (2014-2016) is selected based on the availability of all data for the analysis. A Total Integrated Reporting Disclosure Quality (TIRDQ) index is self-constructed through quantitative content analysis. The finding shows that the quality of IR improved from the year 2014 to 2016. There is no significant difference in the reporting quality between mandatory and voluntary IR. The findings have implications for policy setters who have mandated or are considering mandating IR.