
Classification of the basic kinds of legal responsibility in electoral process
Author(s) -
Андрей Павлович Демин
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
pravoprimenenie
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2658-4050
pISSN - 2542-1514
DOI - 10.24147/2542-1514.2020.4(2).49-57
Subject(s) - political science , institution , legislation , law , professional responsibility , order (exchange) , law and economics , sociology , business , finance
The subject. The legal institution of legal responsibility in electoral process in general as well
as its basic subtypes: constitutional, criminal and administrative responsibility.
The purpose of the article is to identify the main kinds of legal responsibility in the electoral
process.
Methodology. The author uses such general theoretical and specific scientific methods as
comparative analysis, generalization, interpretation and classification as well as systemic
analysis and formal logical methods.
The main results of the research. The author takes into account the opinions of academic
lawyers and analyzes the legal institution of legal responsibility in electoral process in general. The author considers and examines the classification of constitutional, criminal and
administrative responsibility in the electoral process, reveals and analyzes the essence of
such fundamental concepts as legal responsibility, kinds of legal responsibility, electoral
rights of citizens. The article describes the special and distinguishing characteristics of different kinds of legal responsibility. The author also gives reasons for the necessity of a special set of state coercive measures in order to make the electoral process transparent. As
far as the Russian Federation law “On elections and referenda” does not contain any specific
measures of legal responsibility and has references to other laws, the author sees it important to fill this gap for future codification of electoral legislation. Constitutional legal
responsibility is peculiar in electoral process. It means that responsibility is realized in procedural form, which is enshrined not only in Federal laws, but in subordinate laws, such as
instructions of the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation.
Conclusions. Legal liability in the electoral process has the following characteristics: it is expressed in the obligation to undergo measures of state enforcement; its basis is the violation of material and procedural norms of the electoral law; it is associated with various kinds
of unavoidable negative consequences; the guilty person will be subjected to restriction of
personal and other property rights; the offender is charged with the obligation to restore
the violated right or compensation for damage.