Civil judiciary as a form of justice in civil cases

The article is devoted to the study of the main aspects of justice in the form of civil proceedings to protect violated, unrecognized or disputed rights, freedoms or interests of individuals, rights and interests of legal entities, the interests of the state. The article provides a scientific analysis of legislative provisions, doctrinal positions and materials of judicial practice in the context of clarifying the issues of effective restoration of the rights of interested parties by the competent national authorities, including the judiciary. In this aspect, it is emphasized that the success of harmonization of the Ukrainian legal system with the system of European standards largely depends on the values ​​of national justice.The author supports the position that, in the administration of justice, the judiciary is independent and acts as an arbitrator in a dispute over law. The efficiency of the courts has three components: the efficiency and efficiency of dispute resolution, the validity and legality of judicial acts, ensuring the possibility of their implementation. The court is called to perform its functions guided only by law. It should not depend on the subjective influence of anyone, as interference with the administration of justice is inadmissible and results in liability under the law.At present, a national court cannot appropriate legislative or executive power. Equally, the delegation of their functions by the courts, as well as the assignment of these functions by other bodies or officials are not allowed. However, according to the author, this does not mean that in Ukraine, as in other legal systems of the Romano-Germanic type, judicial precedent cannot be an auxiliary source of law.It is concluded that civil jurisdiction is the jurisdiction of the general court to consider and resolve legal requirements referred to by law for consideration and resolution in civil proceedings, in order to effectively protect violated, unrecognized or disputed rights, freedoms or interests of interested parties.The position is substantiated that, despite the constitutional provision on extending the jurisdiction of courts to any legal dispute, the norms of special normative acts on the protection of civil rights of interested parties should be taken into account, which, in turn, indicates that judicial jurisdiction civil proceedings have their limits.