Open AccessThe concept of «property» (according to the practice of the European court of human rights)
Author(s) -
M.V. Dobrev
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
naukovij vìsnik užgorodsʹkogo nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu. serìâ pravo
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2664-6153
pISSN - 2307-3322
DOI - 10.24144/2307-3322.2021.64.67
Subject(s) - law , human rights , political science , right to property , property law , numerus clausus , property rights , fundamental rights , law and economics , international human rights law , public property , property (philosophy) , common law , sociology , philosophy , epistemology
The article is devoted to the autonomous meaning of the term «property» used by the European Court of Human Rights. Emphasis is placed on the fact that in national legal systems, approaches to defining the concept of proper-ty, property rights have been and remain different. The violation of property as ownership exclusively of material things, excluding other rights and interests (substantive legal interests), the application of a formal classification of objects of law leads to violations of the right of everyone to own, use and dispose of their property by public author-ities and local governments. property. As the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights is a source of law in the member states of the Council of Europe, national law cannot contradict the Convention and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.It is noted that the European Court of Human Rights, applying the autonomous meaning of the term «proper-ty», which does not depend on the formal classification of property rights in the national legislation of the mem-ber states of the Council of Europe, applies the following approaches to the concept of «property», the concept and content of property rights. that would be compatible with national legal systems. As a result of the analysis of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, it was established that «property» is: 1) ownership of existing material things; 2) assets, including claims that the entity can claim to have at least a «legitimate ex-pectation» that they will be realized; 3) other rights and interests that constitute assets and can be considered as «property rights».
Property that falls within the scope of Art. 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms constitute, inter alia, economic resources to which natural persons have no registered property rights, but which have originally belonged to their ancestors and parents for economic activities, as well as income that individuals receive from the use of these resources.