z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The effectiveness of argumentation based learning and problem based learning models in improving student’s argumentation skills about salt hydrolysis concept
Author(s) -
Anisa Puspita Sari,
AUTHOR_ID,
Harizon Harizon,
Muhammad Haris Effendi-Hasibuan,
AUTHOR_ID,
AUTHOR_ID
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
jurnal pendidikan kimia/jurnal pendidikan kimia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2549-3116
pISSN - 2085-3653
DOI - 10.24114/jpkim.v13i3.29928
Subject(s) - argumentation theory , argumentative , class (philosophy) , mathematics education , test (biology) , problem based learning , psychology , computer science , artificial intelligence , biology , paleontology , philosophy , epistemology , political science , law
Learning model that can train students in developing their argumentative skills includes the Argumentation Based Learning (ABL) and Problem Based Learning (PBL). This study aimed to see the effectiveness of the ABL and PBL models in improving students' argumentation skills about the concept of salt hydrolysis. The study was conducted in the class XI MIA SMAN 1 Tebo Jambi with a sample consisting of two classes. Some 50 students were recruited purposively to be the participants of this study. Concurrent embedded mix method using two group pretest posttest control group design was used in this study. The results of independent t-test showed that ABL was more effective than PBL (t= 4.864; p-value=0.00 < 0.05) in improving the students' argumentation skills. This was supported by the N-gain test of ABL which was 0.82 and the N -Gain test of PBL was 0.68. The results of observations revealed that the ABL students had more intensive opportunities to debate their argumentation than those in the PBL class. This was believed as the major factor influencing the difference in the students’ argumentation skills.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here