女性主義關懷倫理學與生命倫理學

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English.女性主義倫理學家將生命倫理學諸理倫如 Engelhardt 的把自主性放在第一位的“世俗多元倫理學”Veatch的“契約論倫理學”Pellegrino以有利或行善原則為基礎的倫理學羅爾斯的“正義倫”倫理學道義論倫理學後果論倫理學以及Beauchamp 和Childress的原則倫理學等統稱為“正義倫理學”Ethics of Justice其理論模型稱“工程模型”Engineering Model將它們與“關懷倫理學”Ethics of Care及“關懷模型”Caring Model相對立以女性主義的視角對生命倫理學理論和實踐進行了批評。審視女性主義對生命倫理學的批評對照和比較女性主義關懷倫理學與生命倫理學我們發現女性主義關懷倫理學的理論和內涵確實給人以清新的感覺女性主義關懷倫理學與生命倫理學如能互補將對倫理推理和倫理難題的解決提供較好的倫理理論和實踐方法。Feminists find that females tend to focus on details about the relationships among the persons involved and to seek innovative solutions that protect everyone's interest. In contracts, males typically try to identify and apply a relevant principle or rule (which they take to be universal or valid from an impartial perspective), even if doing so means sacrificing someone's interest. Feminists call the former approach an ethics of care (or responsibility) and the latte an ethics of justice.Feminism thinks ethics of justice includes bioethical theories such as Engelhardt's "Secular Bioethics", Veatch's "Contract Ethics", Deontological Theory, Utilitarianism, Beauchamp and Childress' principlism, Pellegrino's virtue and duty-based ethics, and so on. Feminists criticize ethics of justice or all of bioethical theories seriously. The ethics of care challenges all of these dominant bioethical theories as deductivism and principle-based ethics. Feminists down play the role of rights and allegedly universal principles and rules, in favor of an emphasis on caring, interpersonal relationships, and context.I think a view about ethics of care and ethics of justice should meet each other in the practice of bioethics arrived after reviewing the criticism of feminists. The essay concludes that there is no reason to consider the ethics of care inferior or the ethics of justice inferior. An ideal bioethics should incorporate both approaches. DOWNLOAD HISTORY | This article has been downloaded 86 times in Digital Commons before migrating into this platform.