Open Access如何看待政府在疫病中的干預？自由至上主義的道德困境
Author(s) -
Ellen Y. Zhang
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
zhong wai yixue zhe xue
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1386-6354
DOI - 10.24112/ijccpm.191929
Subject(s) - meaning (existential) , government (linguistics) , paternalism , pejorative , political science , law and economics , state (computer science) , power (physics) , sociology , law , psychology , linguistics , philosophy , physics , algorithm , quantum mechanics , computer science , psychotherapist
LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract also in English.
在「自由至上主義」(Libertarianism)的政治哲學詞典中「政府干預」(state interference)或「政府父權主義」(state paternalism)基本上是一個貶義詞因為政府意味著官僚、腐敗、無效率意味著對公民個體自由的干預和限制。然而自2020年以來在全球範圍內爆發和流行的新冠疫情讓一貫反政府干預、堅持「小政府」原則的自由至上派的學者倍受挑戰。 面對疫情的肆虐許多人認為政府的干預如封城、鎖國、宵禁、隔離、邊控等措施的實行是必要的。本文探討自由至上主義的自由觀在疫病中所面臨的道德兩難以及政府應在公共衛生管理中扮演的角色。作者指出雖然自由至上主義的一些有關自由的理念在現實生活中顯得過於教條和不切實際但從另一個角度看當我們一再倒向政府的力量以抗擊疫情之時 我們更需要自由至上主義對我們的提醒以防政府利用疫情不斷擴大自身的權力範圍最終傷害每個人的自由權利。
For Libertarians, state interference or state paternalism has a pejorative meaning given that government often implies bureaucracy, corruption, and inefficiency. However, such a view has faced significant resistance since the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. For the sake of public health, many people now believe that we must accept much greater governmental intervention in our lives and that it is morally permissible and necessary to have public policies such as lockdowns, mandatory social distancing, border restrictions, and mandatory vaccination. Is it true that “there are no libertarians in a pandemic”? This paper explores the role of the government and the meaning of individual liberty in the face of the current public health crisis. The author contends that the Libertarian views of civil liberty and self-ownership should be taken more seriously as the government obtains more power and a host of extraordinary interventions are being implemented during the pandemic.