Open Access評論＜人工智能醫學應用的前景與風險＞一文中“責任歸咎”的疑慮與可能的因應
Author(s) -
Wanling Chou
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
zhong wai yixue zhe xue
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 1386-6354
DOI - 10.24112/ijccpm.171682
Subject(s) - object (grammar) , autonomy , download , computer science , psychology , sociology , law , artificial intelligence , world wide web , political science
LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract in English only.The ultimate result of AI medicine may be the birth of "Dr. Super AI." Dr. Super AI would not only supplement medical care, but also acquire a level of autonomy. Its capacity for reason would be much greater than that of most human doctors, but it would not possess certain intrinsic characteristics of human beings, so it would fall somewhere between "machine" and "human." This raises an important question: if such an agent makes mistakes, who or what is responsible? This paper argues that this "responsibility gap" is not insurmountable. If the types of mistakes made by Dr. Super AI can be distinguished, we can find the corresponding object of responsibility. This is a viable countermeasure, at least until AI robots have developed human emotions and moral awareness.DOWNLOAD HISTORY | This article has been downloaded 28 times in Digital Commons before migrating into this platform.