
Aortocoronary Bypass Surgery in Patients with Recurrent Post-Coronary Stenting Angina
Author(s) -
Р. А. Валиева,
Б. Л. Мультановский,
Н. Г. Сибгатуллин
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
kreativnaâ hirurgiâ i onkologiâ
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2307-0501
pISSN - 2076-3093
DOI - 10.24060/2076-3093-2021-11-3-260-264
Subject(s) - medicine , cohort , perioperative , angina , percutaneous coronary intervention , surgery , coronary artery disease , coronary artery bypass surgery , cardiology , canadian cardiovascular society , bypass surgery , artery , myocardial infarction
Background . A wide adoption of percutaneous coronary operations has led to an average one-third reduction in the aortocoronary bypass surgery (ACB) rate and altering of the ACB patient profile to mainly represent advanced occlusive coronary atherosclerosis. Materials and methods . The study analyses treatment outcomes in coronary heart disease patients with recurrent angina after a previous endovascular intervention. Over years 2009–2015, 1,023 ACB operations were performed at the Almetyevsk — OAO Tatneft Medical Unit cardiac surgery rooms. Pre-surgery coronary artery stenting (CAS) was rendered at various terms in 96 patients (23 % women, 76 % men; cohort 1). The main cohort (n = 96) was divided into 2 subgroups: IA (n = 64), single CAS; IB (n = 32), multiple CAS patients. For statistical significance, cohort 2 (control) comprised 185 patients (21 % women, 79 % men) to include every 5th history of the remaining 927 patients operated within same period. Results and discussion . The mean aortic occlusion time was shorter in multiple CAS patients vs. other cohorts (61.3 ± 31.2 vs. 72.5 ± 27.8 and 70.7 ± 41.2 min). Cohort 1 had an overall higher emergency resternotomy rate due to ongoing bleeding (7.4 and 8.3 vs. 2.0 %). Furthermore, pre-surgery multiple CAS patients more likely faced the complications of perioperative MI (8.5 vs. 3.1 and 1.4 %) and acute postoperative heart failure (7.2 vs. 2.3 and 1.4 %, p < 0.01). This cohort often required inotropic support (9.3 vs. 3.8 and 2.1 %). Conclusion . Statistical analysis revealed a significantly higher complication and mortality rate in patients with previous coronary stenting compared to ACB patients. Adverse ACB outcomes were observed with multiple-coronary stenting cases, in contrast to the cohort with no pre-surgery interventions.