z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
STUDI HASIL BELAJAR TARI SISWA ANTARA MENGGUNAKAN METODE COOPERATIVE LEARNING TIPE THINK-PAIR-SHARE DENGAN METODE KONVENSIONAL DI SMA 2 KELAS XI IPS SIJUNJUNG
Author(s) -
Rara Vidi Ayu,
Yuliasma Yuliasma,
Afifah Asriati
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
jurnal sendratasik (edisi elektronik)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2302-3201
DOI - 10.24036/jsu.v7i3.103446
Subject(s) - dance , mathematics education , data collection , psychology , normality , test (biology) , mathematics , statistics , art , visual arts , paleontology , biology
This article aimed to describe the differences and observe the learning outcomes of students in dance subjects using conventional methods with the Cooperative Learning type Think-Pair-Share. The type of this research was experimental research. The population in this reserach were all students of class XI IPS SMA 2 Sijunjung. The method of sampling used random sampling techniques with selected classes based on the same average, namely XI IPS 3 and XI IPS 2. The types of data in this research were primary and secondary data. The research instrument was a test. Data collection techniques were carried out by observation, and tests. The techniques of data analysis were done by the steps of normality test, homogeneity test and hypothesis test. The results of the research showed that there were differences in students’ learning outcomes of dance in class XI IPS 3 (experiment) with the average 84.45 using the cooperative learning method think-pair-share type with the results of learning dance as well as in class XI IPS 2 (control) with an average grade of 80.12 using conventional learning methods. The improvement of students’ learning outcomes in class XI IPS 3 (experiment) and in class XI IPS 2 (control) using cooperative learning methods think-pair-share type with conventional learning methods that were strengthened by testing obtained a significance value of 0,000 (0.003 t table (3.275> 2,0002) with dk= 60 (n1 + n2-2 = 31 + 31-2). Thus, it can be concluded that the proposed hypothesis H0 is accepted and the proposed H1 is rejected.Keywords: application, conventional method, cooperative learning think-pair-share type.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here