Open AccessA Comparison of Accountability Models in School Counseling Programs
Author(s) -
Mujiyati Mujiyati,
Shinta Mayasari,
Sofwan Adiputra
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
konselor
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2541-5948
pISSN - 1412-9760
DOI - 10.24036/0202093110561-0-00
Subject(s) - accountability , strengths and weaknesses , descriptive statistics , psychology , order (exchange) , management science , counselor education , descriptive research , computer science , research method , psychological counseling , qualitative research , applied psychology , medical education , social psychology , sociology , political science , medicine , higher education , engineering , social science , business , statistics , mathematics , finance , law , business administration
The purpose of this study is to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each accountability evaluation model in order to make it easier for counselors to understand it. The method used is qualitative research that focuses on meanings, definitions, characteristics, symbols and explanations of the concepts learned. Research data is collected through literature review and document analysis. In this study, descriptive document analysis methods were used in data analysis. Descriptive analysis method is a method that aims to test the facts and meanings of research systematically. This model is formed based on different initial goals in the implementation of counseling services. The counselor can choose one of the models that are appropriate to the situation and easy to apply in his school. Accountability Evaluation Models of School Counseling Program has advantages and disadvantages of each. The counselor should choose one model that is appropriate to the situation and easy to implement in his school so that the implementation of the school counseling program can be measured and planned in the future.