data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c3fd/2c3fd2c05ec175716150fd2054ac6d9c19b5c66f" alt="open-access-img"
KOMPARASI AHP DAN ANP PENENTUAN SOLUSI PENGELOLAAN ZAKAT (KASUS DKI DAN SULSEL)
Author(s) -
Nurul Huda,
Desti Anggraini,
Khalifah Muhamad Ali,
Nova Rini,
Yosi Mardoni
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
ekuitas
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2548-5024
pISSN - 1411-0393
DOI - 10.24034/j25485024.y2013.v17.i3.2257
Subject(s) - analytic hierarchy process , stakeholder , prioritization , business , computer science , process management , operations research , engineering , law , political science
This article aims to map the priority problems and solutions in the management of zakat by comparing methods of AHP and ANP. The results showed three kinds of priority issues and solutions zakat management are shared by stakeholder’s charity regulators, zakat organization (OPZ), as well as muzakis and mustahik charity. Based on the method of AHP priority issue on OPZ while the ANP is the regulator. Priority issues regulators are not yet become obligatory zakat system. OPZ is a low priority issue synergies between stakeholders charity. Priority issues mustahik /muzakis ie lack of knowledge muzakis. Both AHP and ANP generate priority scores solving the same problem, namely OPZ. Priority regulator solution are standardization and accreditation OPZ. Priority OPZ solution according to the method of AHP and ANP are increased transparency and accountability. AHP and ANP to experience the difference in the prioritization of solutions muzakis/mustahik , which assume that the priority solution AHP muzakis/mustahik is to improve the ease of service, while the ANP method is to increase socialization and education charity. Although using two different methods, the result of priority between AHP and ANP has many similarities results (priorities). It is likely influenced by the similarity in network models of relationships (connections) between nodes that have formed in the software superdecisions.