z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Clinical results and complications of modified Chow technique two portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release
Author(s) -
GÃ⁄rkan Özkoç
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
el ve mikrocerrahi
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2146-1155
DOI - 10.2399/emd.12.35229
Subject(s) - endoscopic carpal tunnel release , medicine , carpal tunnel syndrome , surgery , perioperative , median nerve , rehabilitation , carpal tunnel release , physical therapy
Objectives: Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is one of the most frequently used surgical procedures of hand surgery. Endoscopic CTR is a new alternative technique of the standard open transverse carpal ligament release. In this study we present the effectiveness and complications of two-portal endoscopic CTR.Methods: Between August 2000 and October 2001, we performed two portal (modified Chow technique) endoscopic CTR to the 19 hands of 17 patients. Fifteen of these were female, two were male and mean age was 54.6 (range: 38-62) years. Mean follow up period was 8 (range: 4-21) months. Clinical evaluation was confirmed with positive ENMG values. Patients were evaluated with the postoperative pain, numbness, scar sensation, returning to daily activities, and complications.Results: All the patients were satisfied with the relief of pain. They all returned to daily activities within two weeks after the operation. There was no hypersensitive scar formation. Numbness didn't change at the six patients. In four patients, complication due to 3-4 common digital nerves injury occurred. Two of them explorated and interfascicular nerve repair was performed.Conclusion: For many years, conventional open technique transverse carpal ligament release was used as the standard surgical procedure of carpal tunnel syndrome. Nowadays, endoscopic CTR has become popular because of the minimal perioperative morbidity, short hospitalisation, early rehabilitation of the hand, less postoperative pain and less scarring. Our experience is the same agreement with those advantages. But unacceptable digital nerve complications were more frequent then the open technique. Especially at the learning period the surgeon should be more careful for the complications. [Hand Microsurg 2012; 1(2.000): 49-52

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here