Open AccessThree Ways in Which Pandemic Models May Perform a Pandemic
Author(s) -
Philippe van Basshuysen,
Lucie White,
Donal Khosrowi,
Mathias Frisch
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
erasmus journal for philosophy and economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.121
H-Index - 9
ISSN - 1876-9098
DOI - 10.23941/ejpe.v14i1.582
Subject(s) - pandemic , performative utterance , covid-19 , context (archaeology) , performativity , positive economics , epistemology , sociology , history , economics , medicine , virology , philosophy , disease , archaeology , pathology , outbreak , infectious disease (medical specialty)
Models not only represent but may also influence their targets in important ways. While models’ abilities to influence outcomes has been studied in the context of economic models, often under the label ‘performativity’, we argue that this phenomenon also pertains to epidemiological models, such as those used for forecasting the trajectory of the Covid-19 pandemic. After identifying three ways in which a model by the Covid-19 Response Team at Imperial College London (Ferguson et al. 2020) may have influenced scientific advice, policy, and individual responses, we consider the implications of epidemiological models’ performative capacities. We argue, first, that performativity may impair models’ ability to successfully predict the course of an epidemic; but second, that it may provide an additional sense in which these models can be successful, namely by changing the course of an epidemic.