Open AccessNot in Employment, Education or Training (NEET); more than a youth policy issue
Author(s) -
Francis Mitrou,
Michele Haynes,
Francisco Perales,
Stephen R. Zubrick,
Janeen Baxter
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
international journal of population data science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2399-4908
DOI - 10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1676
Subject(s) - census , welfare , payment , demographics , population , descriptive statistics , indigenous , educational attainment , income support , demographic economics , observational study , demography , geography , economic growth , political science , medicine , economics , sociology , statistics , ecology , mathematics , finance , law , biology , pathology
Australians who are Not in Employment, Education or Training (NEET) and receive income support span a wide spectrum of working ages. Australian research has concentrated on NEETs aged 15--29 years, in line with international standards. This paper investigates extending the NEET concept to include all working age persons 15--64 years and the value added to welfare policy through analysis of a new linked dataset.MethodsAn observational study design was implemented with individuals aged 15-64 years recorded as receiving Department of Social Services (DSS) income support payments from September 2011 being linked with Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Census data from August 2011 to create a linked dataset for analysis. Descriptive analyses were undertaken of NEET status by Census socio-demographic characteristics, and we modelled the adjusted likelihood of NEET status by Census demographics.ResultsSome 1.37 million or 45.2% of linked DSS payment recipients qualified as NEET. Of NEETs, more than twice as many were female, nearly half were aged 45--64 years, and under 1-in-5 were aged 15--29 years. Multivariate analyses showed that NEETs were more likely to be older, have low educational attainment, have a disability, and to be Indigenous.ConclusionsYoung NEETs aged 15--29 years represented less than 20% of linked DSS payment recipients classified as NEET, suggesting that standard NEETs reporting neglects information on around 80% of the working age NEET population in Australia. Combined with other demographic insights, these results have implications for welfare policy, and indicate a wider range of demographics should be considered under the NEET classification. This may also have implications for Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) reporting.