z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Do patient-reported outcome measures used in assessing outcomes in rehabilitation after hip and knee arthroplasty capture issues relevant to patients? Results of a systematic review and ICF linking process
Author(s) -
Maria Jenelyn M Alviar,
John Olver,
Caroline Brand,
Thomas W. Hale,
Fary Khan
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of rehabilitation medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.893
H-Index - 96
eISSN - 1651-2081
pISSN - 1650-1977
DOI - 10.2340/16501977-0801
Subject(s) - international classification of functioning, disability and health , cinahl , physical therapy , rehabilitation , arthroplasty , medicine , patient reported outcome , physical medicine and rehabilitation , hip surgery , medline , scopus , osteoarthritis , quality of life (healthcare) , psychology , alternative medicine , surgery , psychological intervention , nursing , pathology , political science , law , psychiatry
To compare the contents of patient-reported instruments used in hip and knee arthroplasty rehabilitation with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here