Premium
M ‐Estimates of regression when the scale is unknown and the error distribution is possibly asymmetric: A minimax result
Author(s) -
Li Bing,
Zamar Ruben H.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
canadian journal of statistics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.804
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1708-945X
pISSN - 0319-5724
DOI - 10.2307/3315625
Subject(s) - minimax , mathematics , statistics , scale (ratio) , covariance , covariance matrix , regression , scale parameter , variance (accounting) , distribution (mathematics) , linear regression , regression analysis , gaussian , mathematical optimization , mathematical analysis , geography , business , physics , cartography , accounting , quantum mechanics
Huber (1964) found the minimax‐variance M ‐estimate of location under the assumption that the scale parameter is known; Li and Zamar (1991) extended this result to the case when the scale is unknown. We consider the robust estimation of the regression coefficients (β 1 ,…,β p ) when the scale and the intercept parameters are unknown. The minimax‐variance estimates of (β 1 ,…,β p ) with respect to the trace of their asymptotic covariance matrix are derived. The maximum is taken over ϵ‐contamination neighbourhoods of a central regression model with Gaussian errors (asymmetric contamination is allowed), and the minimum is taken over a large class of generalized M ‐estimates of regression of the Mallow type. The optimal choice of estimates for the nuisance parameters (scale and intercept) is also considered.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom