z-logo
Premium
Flood drift and propagule bank of aquatic macrophytes in a riverine wetland
Author(s) -
Cellot Bernard,
Mouillot Florent,
Henry Christophe P.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of vegetation science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.1
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1654-1103
pISSN - 1100-9233
DOI - 10.2307/3237281
Subject(s) - propagule , wetland , macrophyte , flood myth , environmental science , species richness , floodplain , aquatic plant , hydrology (agriculture) , ecology , bank , biology , geography , geology , geotechnical engineering , archaeology , cartography
. Drift of aquatic macrophyte propagules was investigated in a wetland along the River Rhône, during the first flood after the growing season (i.e. in the winter of 1995–1996). Input and output drift were studied at the beginning, around the top, and at the end of the river overflow in the upper reach of a cut‐off channel. The soil propagule bank was sampled along the study area before and after the flood. The amount and composition of viable propagule drift and bank were determined, analysed and compared. Drift densities and richness were on average higher at the outlet of the channel than at the inlet (respectively: 23.2 vs 13.1 viable propagules/100 m 3 of water and 8.7 vs 2.6 taxa per sample). Immigrating taxa were mostly in the form of helophyte seeds, whereas numerous resident hydrophyte species left the disturbed area rather as vegetative propagules. Temporal variability in propagule bank structure was weak, and mean bank densities did not change before and after the flood (respectively: 33 047 ± 10 510 vs 35 653 ± 15 070 viable propagules/m 2 of ground, including Chara ). However, the density of Elodea canadensis significantly increased after the flood while that of Eleocharis acicularis decreased. This contrast suggests that flood responses vary among species. Despite a broad overlap in the taxa (18 out of 25 were common both to drift and bank collections), no significant relationship occurred in composition or structural changes between flood drift and propagule bank. Flood acted as a means of distribution of existing propagules and also as a provider of new vegetative dispersal units.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here