Premium
Comparative Influences of Light and Temperature on the Growth and Metabolism of Selected Submersed Freshwater Macrophytes
Author(s) -
Barko John W.,
Smart R. Michael
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
ecological monographs
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.254
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1557-7015
pISSN - 0012-9615
DOI - 10.2307/2937264
Subject(s) - photosynthesis , compensation point , acclimatization , macrophyte , hydrilla , biology , botany , biomass (ecology) , respiration , aquatic plant , light intensity , ecology , horticulture , transpiration , physics , optics
Under controlled experimental conditions, the influences of light and temperature on the growth and metabolism of Egeria densa Planch, Hydrilla verticillata Royle, and Myriophyllum spicatum L. were comparatively examined. Light was controlled at six levels ranging between 5 and 75% of full sunlight at solar noon. Water temperature was controlled at five levels ranging between 16° and 32°C. Growth considerations included morphology, biomass, and nutrition. Photosynthesis, respiration, and CO 2 compensation points were determined to evaluate physiological differences in plant growth as affected by the experimental ranges of temperature and light. External morphology in these species was significantly affected by the different experimental light and temperature conditions. Both low light and high temperature promoted extensive shoot elongation and associated canopy formation. Biomass production and carbon metabolism in all species were influenced more by temperature than by light. Each of the species demonstrated metabolic acclimation to light over a broad range. Conversely, the macrophyte species considered here were not strictly capable of acclimating to temperature. Growth rate and the seasonal progression of senescence were interrelated in these species. Higher temperatures stimulated growth and promoted a compression of the growth cycle. The relationship between photosynthesis and respiration (P:R) was appreciably reduced by senescence, but the CO 2 compensation point did not reflect this condition. In the species examined, CO 2 compensation points decreased with increasing temperature, suggesting adaptations to low free CO 2 levels in the environment. Latitudinal differences in integral seasonal temperature, in relation to species—specific ranges of thermal tolerance, appear to be important in influencing the geographical distribution of the species considered here. Light may be the primary determinant of their depth distribution, but its importance in this regard could be somewhat diminished by their significant abilities to extend to the water surface under low light conditions.