Dissecting the causes of variation in intra‐inflorescence allocation in a sexually polymorphic species, Fragaria virginiana (Rosaceae)

In this study we dissect the causes of variation in intra‐inflorescence allocation in a sexually polymorphic species, Fragaria virginiana . We separated out the effects of resource competition during flowering from those of inflorescence architecture, as well as identified the effects of sex morph and genotype. We found position‐based variation in petal length, ovule, pollen, and flower number to be influenced more by architecture than by our resource manipulations during flowering. We also found both genotype‐ and sex‐specific intra‐inflorescence patterns. Furthermore, our data indicate that the sex morph‐specific intra‐inflorescence patterns result from architectural modifications of the basic pattern. In fact, sex‐differential intra‐inflorescence patterns suggest that fitness through male and female function may be maximized by different resource distribution patterns within the inflorescence and may have been modified by past selection. Specifically, females invested heavily in ovules at positions where fruit set was most likely (primary and secondary), at the expense of flower number and allocation per flower at more distal positions. Whereas functional males invested minimally in ovules at all flower positions and produced the most abundantly flowered inflorescences, hermaphrodites, on the other hand, showed intermediate patterns, implying a compromise between sex functions. We suggest that consideration of intra‐inflorescence allocation and inflorescence architecture may reveal the mechanism underlying sexual dimorphism in flower allocation and number.