z-logo
Premium
The response of arbuscular mycorrhizae to fertilization, mowing, and removal of dominant species in a diverse oligotrophic wet meadow
Author(s) -
Titus Jonathan H.,
Lepš Jan
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
american journal of botany
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.218
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1537-2197
pISSN - 0002-9122
DOI - 10.2307/2656635
Subject(s) - biology , botany , holcus lanatus , growing season , repens , agronomy , poaceae , lolium perenne
In a wet oligotrophic meadow located in the Czech Republic, a factorial experiment with treatments consisting of fertilization, mowing, and removal of the dominant species ( Molinia caerulea ) was established in 1994. In 1997 Holcus lanatus, Molinia caerulea, Potentilla erecta, Prunella vulgaris, and Ranunculus auricomus were examined for arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) hyphae, arbuscles, and vesicles three times over the season. Time had a significant effect on AM in all five species. Except for Molinia arbuscles, a modal effect occurred, with the second sampling having a greater level of AM structures than the first and the third. Fertilization had the greatest effect on AM levels by decreasing the level of Holcus hyphae and vesicles, Potentilla vesicles, Prunella hyphae, and Ranunculus hyphae and vesicles. Mowing significantly increased the number of Potentilla vesicles, and the removal of dominant species had no significant effects. Interactions between time and treatments were common. Significant effects to the arbuscle:vesicle ratio were infrequent, and those that occurred were related to changes over the season. Seasonal effects appear to have a more powerful effect on AM structures and the arbuscle:vesicle ratio than do treatment effects. In a second experiment, Ranunculus auricomus, R. acris, and R. nemorosus, sampled four times over the season, showed significant changes in AM colonization. Overall, AM structures either declined over the season or increased from April to May and then declined. There was no AM colonization response to a spring fertilization in the three species. It is postulated that the patterns observed are due to phosphorus availability and seasonal changes in soil moisture and rates of root growth and turnover.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here