Food, Predation Risk, and Microhabitat Selection in a Marsh Fish Assemblage
Author(s) -
McIvor Carole C.,
Odum William E.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.144
H-Index - 294
eISSN - 1939-9170
pISSN - 0012-9658
DOI - 10.2307/1941632
Subject(s) - sedimentary depositional environment , marsh , fundulus , benthic zone , ecology , predation , invertebrate , habitat , abundance (ecology) , biomass (ecology) , biology , fishery , fish <actinopterygii> , wetland , structural basin , paleontology
Fishes moving onto the surface of a tidal freshwater marsh from an adjacent stream were sampled with flume nets in spring through autumn for 2 yr. Significantly higher numbers were found at sites adjacent to shallow—sloped depositional banks than at sites adjacent to deeper, steeper sloped erosional banks of the stream. Marsh surface features appeared similar, so explanations for this apparent habitat selection were sought in the subtidal portion of the stream. To determine whether the relative abundance of benthic invertebrate prey differed in the two environments, litter bags were placed in the subtidal for 4 wk. Despite higher numbers of invertebrates in erosional zones, both the wet biomass per sample and the mean wet biomass per organism were significantly greater in depositional sites. To test the hypothesis that invertebrate food is more available to fishes in the depositional subtidal, banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus) were placed in feeding enclosures in both depositional and erosional subtidal habitats in two streams. These fish obtained significantly more food in the shallow depositional subtidal. To test the hypothesis that predation pressure differs with subtidal geomorphology, mummichogs (Fundulus heteroclitus) were tethered on the first half of the rising tide in both depositional and erosional environments in three creeks. Significantly more mummichogs disappeared from tethers and were presumed taken on erosional banks. We conclude that two mechanisms operate in the stream subtidal to give rise to the greater fish abundance at marsh surface sites adjacent to depositional areas. At low tide, when small fishes are confined to creek channels, they select shallow depositional habitats where (1) the availability of benthic invertebrate prey is greatest and (2) predator pressure is less. As the tide rises and inundates the marsh surface, these small fishes seek shelter on the marsh surface adjacent to their preferred low—tide refuge.